|
I
n p u t F r o m O u r R e a d e r s
LETTERS
FIRST INSTALLMENT
(June 10, 2004)
Biased Opinion Articles?
I just saw CounterBias.com
for the first time (5/06/04). What impression should I have? Am I to
believe you are without bias?
Your story regarding Karen Hughes makes
numerous references to her being French born. No mention of her national origin,
citizenship, etc.
I haven't read her book, and I don't plan to. I also think smearing Kerry for being too close to the French
is ridiculous.
However, your story is just as poorly written and biased as those critical of Kerry. Perhaps worse.
Stories written about Kerry and his relationship with the French or other foreign governments, although a
stretch, lend themselves to the idea that his
administration would be influenced, perhaps too extensively, by foreign governments. What point does
your article make? His smearing her for being born in France (as a U.S. citizen?) and your celebration of it
shows a lack of principle. If your goal is to point out bias, hypocrisy, etc., shouldn't you at least
attempt to rise above it?
Larry Morse
Smearing Hughes
I read with interest your
column on Karen Hughes, and wanted to point out something about her
being born in Paris. She was born there because her father was in
the U.S. Army and was stationed in France at the time. I think
it's a bit different than being French, though I'm not completely sure
what the big deal is about that. (I admit that it's good for a
laugh, a joke, but that's about it for me.)
Anyway, smearing Ms. Hughes is a bit low, don't you think? At
least smearing her for something she is not seems to be. Perhaps
you'd consider a correction on the piece, for at least that part of it.
I know yours is an opinion site, but you should have facts
straight. BTW, providing links for your sources might help, too.
I'd be interested in seeing where some of your information comes
from.
Chris Johnson
Angry Patriot
Vote democrat.
Have a nice day comrades.
R. Kelley
Grand Rapids, MI
Wes Clark, War
Criminal?
Gowans is a such a
flipping loser. Actually, the entire gang here died laughing
reading his ludicrous piece of crap with regards to Mister Bush, and
Gowans childlike, lame insults of 4-STAR GENERAL WESLEY K. CLARK.
Gowans, buy yourself a clue.
Do you know what the overall consensus is over here right now?
Do you know what the overall consensus is on who we want to see at
our helm after the November election? I don't think you do. Jay, Michael, Ray, Lonnie, none of the
guys here think you do. You are no better than the other 'blinded by the right' LAME-HEADED
idiots who sit in their fat desks in America sending out insults about
true American Heroes who have served our country.
You seem to forget some people in your articles who skipped out their
Guard Duty and turned up missing for the majority of the time they
should have served. Gowans, do you truly believe that we sit around and buy your
filthy "war criminal" remarks?
Did you, like General Wes Clark, serve in Vietnam?
As we read your article and laugh our asses off at your true brainwashed
stupidity, we only wonder if your Editor really knows what a prize he
has in you.
Sgt. Koenig,
Nasiriyah, Iraq
Editor's Note: Gowans
is not a regular Counterbias contributor, and this was his first and, as
of now, only piece for our publication. Editorially, Counterbias
strongly disagrees with Gowans's characterization of Wes Clark as a
"war criminal", but we do not force our editorial agenda on
our contributors. We wish General Clark the best in his new journey in
American politics.
|