|
Prometheus - October 2003 |
B
O O K R E V I E W
Danny
Schechter, a television producer and independent filmmaker, is a notable
figure in the media community. As a writer and speaker focused on media
issues, Schechter brings to the table a more leftward viewpoint than
that which is found in today’s mainstream media (no, the media isn't
as 'liberal' as Fox News may tell you, and the fact that people like
Schechter no longer exist in the mainstream is testament to that). Schechter
is extremely critical of the way the media has conglomerated into a mass
of right-leaning, sensationalistic, pro-authority and
screw-everyone-else insanity, and, as the inside jacket states, Embedded
is his analysis of the media’s “cheerleading for a war in which
reporting was sanitized, staged, and suppressed”. Calling
himself “The News Dissector”, Schechter runs two websites,
Mediachannel.org and Newsdissector.org, the latter being his blog. For
those seeking a critical view of media matters, “The
Dissector’s Daily Blog” is a must-read, informative and
readable, grouped with the likes of The
Daily Howler, Pressbox
and CableNewser. Why
introduce Schechter's new
book,
Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception, with a seemingly unrelated
description of his blog? Well, because the
book
is the blog. With little much else, the
book
isn't much more than entries taken directly from his web writings,
rearranged, formatted into a columnized, newspaper-like format, and
printed in
book
form, with hopes of making a tidy profit (one could say that by selling
the
book, he
wishes to disseminate his views to a wider audience, but then what
audience is wider than the internet on which the
book's
contents already appear?). Unfortunately,
the fact that most everything in the
book
is simply reproduced from widely-available online form (the archives are
all still online, and worth going through if time is spare), is not the
book’s
worst problem. The
blog-grabbing nature wasn’t constrained to content alone—even
spelling and punctuation errors are taken straight from the online text,
and they simply haven’t been corrected. Quality control is minimal,
with spelling, punctuation, and even factual errors, all quite eminent.
It’s as if the
book
was thrown together in a matter of days, without much contextual
editing—if any at all—to go along with it. Further,
the books format—a virtual replication of blog entries—make it much
less readable as a
book.
There is absolutely no flow to the many short, albeit interesting and
informative, entries. The choppy nature of a blog, with new entries once
a day or less rather than a continuous flow, mean that the
book
version contains much repetition that may grate on the reader’s nerves
(the MSNBC Ashleigh Banfield saga that Schechter is fond of mentioning
feels as though it is repeated fifty times in the
book).
|
|
© 2004 CounterBias.com