The American Theocracy's New Symbol
 

July 25 2006
Counterbias.com
MEL SEESHOLTZ
 

After acknowledging he didn’t get all “choked-up” about yellow ribbons tied around trees or flag stickers pasted everywhere, comedian George Carlin quipped, “They’re symbols, and I leave symbols to the symbol-minded.”

Well, the “symbol-minded” have struck in Hickory Hill, Tennessee. At a cost of $260,000, World Overcomers Outreach Ministries unveiled the United States of Jesus’ “Statue of Liberation.” It was proudly described by the Christian news service Agape Press:

Although designed to resemble the 151-foot Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor, World Overcomers’ statue has a few distinct features in addition to its smaller size. Instead of a single tablet inscribed with the date of the Declaration of Independence, the 72-foot figure erected by the Tennessee church holds in its left hand two tablets representing the Ten Commandments given to Moses by God to govern His people. In the figure’s other hand, in place of a torch, is a large cross. And engraved on the figure’s crown is the word “Jehovah.”

But a picture is worth a thousand words.

World Overcomers’ pastor, Apostle Alton Williams – yes, he’s called “Apostle” Williams – had a few things to say about the statue’s raison d’etre:

We just wanted to send a message to let people know that God established this nation … If you really did honest research on the foundations of this nation, you would find out that the Founding Fathers of our nation and many of our early Supreme Court rulings established that this nation would be a Christian nation.

Aside from the First Amendment – “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” – the overt religious bigotry and utter disrespect for any non-Christian American, the “Apostle” is utterly wrong historically.

It’s historical fact that the Founding Fathers – most of whom were Deists – carefully and intentionally excised from the Constitution all references to “God,” and used the word only twice in the 85 Federalist Papers. It’s also historical fact that the nation’s first treaties, unanimously approved in 1797 by Congress and endorsed by President John Adams, stated “The Government of the United States … is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”

The Statue of Liberation is, in reality, a symbol of theocratic enslavement which is, after all, the goal of the Christian Right.

“Would Jesus discriminate?”

 

The question has been popping up on billboards, yard signs and in newspaper ads around conservative central Indiana lately …

 

“Jesus taught us to love everyone, even our enemies and those who are different from us, not destroy and mistreat them,'' said one ad published in the Indianapolis Star. …

And how did the self-righteous, “Statue of Liberation” Christian Right respond?

An independent Baptist congregation along a major thoroughfare posted the message “God discriminated at Sodom” on its sign board. A Christian conservative group, the American Family Association of Indiana, distributed radio ads saying, “Not only did Jesus discriminate; he is going to discriminate again.” [italics added]

These people actually claim to know what “Jesus” is going to do. How presumptuous (and preposterous) is that?

The billboards and ads were meant to foster acceptance of gays and lesbians, but could easily be applied to the acceptance of people with different religious views and spiritual beliefs: anyone the “Statue of Liberation” does not welcome and the Christian Right disdains. One commentator made the obvious points and offered a more accepting image.

Note that the radio responses were sponsored by “the American Family Association of Indiana.” Don Wildmon’s American Family Association and its “pro-family” state affiliates are dedicated to hurting gay and lesbian Americans – and their families – as much as possible and in every way possible. How “Christian” and “pro-family” is that?

To be sure, the Christian Right is politically influential, as long as King George the W and his gofers (like Rick Santorum and Marcus Kindley) are in power. These Machiavellians are so wrapped up in their own supposedly religion-based bigoted dogma as to be dangerous, as was another fanatic who used Christianity to advance his cause.

Hitler concocted “the final solution.” The Christian Right concocted “ex-gay” therapies that include such things as electric shock treatments and exorcisms:

From the 1960s through the early 1990s, the Rev. Mel White played a behind-the-scenes role in the resurgence of evangelical Christianity. While pastoring several West Coast churches and working with national crusades like Youth for Christ, White produced films and ghostwrote books for a “who’s who” of evangelical leaders, including the Revs. Billy Graham, Jerry Falwell, D. James Kennedy and Pat Robertson.

Unknown to his friends and colleagues, White was also a closeted gay man who was nearly driven to suicide after two decades of struggling to save his marriage – and, he believed, his soul – with “reparative therapies” including electric shock and exorcism.

The megalomania of the Christian Right’s leaders and their “ex-gay” allies was well summarized by Alan Hicks in his OpEd:

Reparative therapy unnecessarily tampers with the mind

Saturday, July 01, 2006

 

In response to Harlow J. Keith’s June 23 letter, which addressed a June 11 article on the ex-gay ministry Exodus International, I address a couple of Keith’s misconceptions regarding homosexuality, reparative therapy and the “only way out” Exodus International and the evangelical Christian community portray.

 

Reparative therapy, the psychotherapeutic process pioneered by Joseph Nicolosi and Charles Socarides, is widely condemned by the vast majority of mental health professionals, including the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association and the American Counseling Association. In addition, the National Association of School Psychologists, the National Association of Social Workers and the Royal College of Nursing also have renounced it. …

 

The supposed need for reparative therapy derives solely from this assumption, that homosexuality is a mental illness and, therefore, in need of treatment. The fact that this assumption is based on spiritual-scriptural interpretation, rather than on scientific research and evidence, is apparent in that most reparative-therapy practitioners and centers are financially backed and supported by conservative Christian transformational ministries. They maintain that homosexuality is a socially destructive and undesirable chosen behavior, and that change is necessary and possible. Despite contradictions with current mainstream research results, reparative-therapy supporters continue to use biased research to purport this therapy to be an effective and safe alternative to an unhappy lifestyle.

 

Reparative therapy is, in short, a tampering and manipulation of the mind and conscience, the psychological well-being of a human being, something that we as humans do not have the right to tamper with. It is interesting and peculiar that this segment of the Christian community, which claims confidence in the power of prayer and the power of the Holy Spirit, would stoop to and participate in such medically unsound, potentially psychologically harmful techniques simply to satisfy their own egos and scriptural understanding. …

Perhaps a replica of The Statue of Liberation should be placed at the entrance to all “ex-gay therapy” camps along with the motto Arbeit Macht Frei (in biblical lettering, of course).

---