Making a Mockery of 'Diversity' and 'Academic Freedom'
 

March 29 2006
Counterbias.com
MEL SEESHOLTZ
 

“Diversity Day.” Sounds like a good idea, but as 365Gay.com reported “for the second time Viroqua High School [in Wisconsin] has cancelled Diversity Day…. Speakers were to have included representatives of the African American, Latino, Jewish, Muslim, Native American and gay communities,” as well as speakers from other minority groups such as Hmong (an Asian ethnic group), Buddhists, the physically disadvantaged and the economically disadvantaged. So why was it cancelled again this year?

“Diversity Day, in 2004, was cancelled after several hundred people signed a petition opposing a speaker on LGBT issues” [link added]. According to World Net Daily, this year’s event was cancelled

after the Florida-based public-interest legal group Liberty Counsel raised a potential challenge, insisting the program include the viewpoint of a former homosexual. …

 

This time, a fax from Liberty Counsel stated local pastor Don Greven of Bad Axe Lutheran Church and the grandfather of a senior at the high school raised concerns about no Christian, or formerly homosexual, viewpoint being included among the speakers…

 

“By excluding the Christian and ex-gay viewpoints, the (Viroqua) District violates the Establishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection,” the group said.

Liberty Council intimated legal action if the Diversity Day event were held. According to the Montana News Association,

On March 9, Liberty Counsel sent a letter to the District Administrator, explaining that the censorship of the viewpoints of Christians and former homosexuals violated the Establishment Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection guarantee. Liberty Counsel sent another letter on March 14 to the District Administrator and Board of Education. Two days later, the District Administrator confirmed in a telephone call that Diversity Day had been cancelled.

 

Mathew D. Staver, president and general counsel of Liberty Counsel, stated: “We are pleased that the District cancelled Diversity Day instead of censoring the viewpoints of Christians and former homosexuals. One of the Diversity Day organizers labeled the former homosexual’s viewpoint as ‘non-positive.’ This is yet another attempt to indoctrinate our youth with the harmful message that homosexuals cannot change. While touting the message of tolerance, homosexual activists refuse to be tolerant of opposing viewpoints. Our youth deserve to know the truth about homosexuality – that people can choose to overcome same-sex attractions and that acting on those attractions results in devastating physical, mental, and spiritual consequences.” [italics added]

As for attorney Staver’s endorsement of so-called “ex-gay” therapies, according to the American Medical Association, “there is no published scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of reparative therapy as a treatment to change one’s sexual orientation.” The AMA “does not recommend aversion therapy for gay men and lesbians.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics agrees, stating “therapy directed at specifically changing sexual orientation is contraindicated, since it can provoke guilt and anxiety while having little or no potential for achieving changes in orientation.”

The American Psychological Association has stated that “groups who try to change the sexual orientation of people through so-called conversion therapy are misguided and run the risk of causing a great deal of psychological harm to those they say they are trying to help.”

The American Psychiatric Association concurs: “gay men and lesbians who have accepted their sexual orientation positively are better adjusted than those who have not done so. … The potential risks of ‘reparative therapy’ are great, including depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior.” The American Psychiatric Association’s position statement is quite clear. It states, in part, “efforts to repathologize homosexuality by claiming that it can be cured are often guided not by rigorous scientific or psychiatric research, but sometimes by religious and political forces opposed to full civil rights for gay men and lesbians.”

Other professional organizations that agree attempting to change a person’s sexual orientation is dangerous, destructive and counterproductive include the American Counseling Association, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers. In 1999, both the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association decried “ex-gay therapies” as “unethical.” 

But Mr. Staver’s statement endorsing such “therapies” does make sense. According to their “about us,”

Recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) organization, Liberty Counsel is funded by donations from concerned individuals, churches and organizations across the country. Donations to this ministry are tax-deductible. [italics added]

Note the last, clickable line: “this ministry.” That would account for their faith-based belief in “ex-gay” therapies that have zero medical validity.

According to People for the American Way,

Established in 1989, the Orlando, Florida-based Liberty Counsel provides information on “First Amendment religious rights, and legal defense to defend those rights.” The group boasts over 400 affiliate attorneys throughout the United States. In 2000, Liberty Counsel merged organizational resources with Dr. Jerry Falwell Ministries. [italics added]

Mathew D. Staver has been particularly active – and successful – in fighting against equal civil rights for gay and lesbian Americans, fighting for an American Christian theocracy, and fighting against “diversity.” Mr. Staver was “pleased” that Viroqua High’s Diversity Day was cancelled. It wasn’t the kind of “diversity” Liberty Council supports, as was made clear by Mr. Staver’s arguments against allowing students to even hear about “diversity” at Christian colleges and universities:

Mat Staver, president of the Florida-based group Liberty Counsel, says Christian schools like Liberty University are willing to share the gospel message of Christ with homosexuals who are not acting confrontationally. However, he contends, Christian schools have no obligation to welcome militant homosexuals on campus.

 

“When people like Mel White and his group Soulforce decide to make a very political, highly publicized event -- and not simply to come on campus but to make a political statement as they are doing with this so-called tour across the country – I believe it’s the right of private universities and colleges to exclude their entry into the university or college area,” Staver says. …

 

The Soulforce members involved in the so-called Equality Ride tour are acting militantly and not peacefully, Staver contends. Therefore, he feels Christian schools have ever right to refuse to welcome these activists on their campuses. [links added]

Staver and Liberty Council opposed Viroqua High’s Diversity Day because it did not include “Christian” and “ex-gay” speakers, but they found it appropriate to urge that gay speakers not be given access to or a voice at “Christian” schools. So much for “academic freedom” and “diversity.”

Is insinuating legal action against a school district that can hardly afford an extended legal battle “confrontational”? Is Liberty Council’s well publicized legal intimidation “militant” and “confrontational”? Aren’t Liberty Council’s highly publicized actions also “political”? A Christian political-social agenda is, after all, what Liberty Council is all about. It is one of the anti-gay signatories of Rev. Don Wildmon’s and the American Family Association’s current boycott of Ford Motor Company for its egregious sins of supporting civil equality and advertising in gay-related publications. (Wildmon’s AFA is also irate that Wal-Mart will be selling the Brokeback Mountain DVD.)

Liberty Council’s president and general counsel is adept at intimidating schools and school districts with legal action. Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts Jr.’s article “Time to stop hiding behind the Bible: Scripture seems to be taken literally only when it’s convenient – such as with gay issues” put it bluntly and simply: “I’ve had it up to here with the moral hypocrisy and intellectual constipation of Bible literalists.” Mr. Pitts was writing an open letter to Donna Reddick, “a teacher who condemned homosexuality as part of a broadcast at Miami Sunset Senior High.”

In a March 24, 2006 Agape Press article, Mr. Staver made his usual theocratic comments and implied threats in a piece titled, “Staver: Teacher’s Bible-Based Opinion on Homosexuality No Grounds for Discipline[,] Attorney Suggests School Wouldn’t Win a Court Case If It Comes to That”:

Staver also expresses his opinion that Principal Cox [of Miami Sunset Senior High] is wrong to suggest that Reddick's comments violate the so-called “separation of state” or “discriminate against sexual preference.” …

 

“Everything was pro-homosexuality except for one comment on the last day,” Staver says, “and that’s the comment by this teacher, Donna Reddick. And she clearly was able, in that context, to give her own personal view based upon Scripture being contrary to homosexuality.” [italics added]

“Pro-homosexual” is a favorite phrase of the Christian Right. Most people call it “tolerance” and/or “respect for other people.”

One has to wonder if Mr. Staver would make the same comments if a teacher used “Scripture” to speak against Jews or Blacks, divorce, working on the Sabbath or eating shellfish, all of which are also condemned in the Bible.

Staver believes the school might end up facing a lawsuit if it chooses to take action against Reddick because some find her viewpoint objectionable. “I think if the school does anything to censor her or to discipline her [it] would be a violation of her constitutional rights, subjecting the school to a lawsuit I don’t believe that they will win,” he says.

Of course Liberty Council supporter Jerry Falwell had some “thoughts” on the cancellation of Viroqua High’s Diversity Day: “earlier this week, in Wisconsin, a high school official cancelled a so-called ‘diversity day’ when it was learned that a group of Christians, including former homosexuals, wanted to present Bible-based perspectives on homosexuality.”

“Present Bible-based perspectives”? Wouldn’t that be preaching religion in a public school? At last check, that was unconstitutional.

The chancellor of Liberty University – where twenty-four Soulforce Equality Riders were arrested for advocating “diversity” – ended his commentary with “There is no level playing field when it comes to the religious freedoms of conservative people of faith. We are literally viewed as second-class citizens by many in leadership in this nation.” Falwell and the Christian Right do so love to play victim as they victimize everyone and anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

Equality Riders were also arrested at Pat Robertson’s Regents University and at ultra-conservative Oral Roberts University. Despite Liberty Council’s feigned defense of “true diversity,” the concept is forbidden at these “Christian” universities. Hypocrisy, pure and simple.

The Equality Riders also visited Oklahoma Baptist University in Shawnee. According to the 365Gay.com report, “there were no problems at Oklahoma Baptist. The riders spoke, prayed and sang with students.” Until this year Oklahoma Baptist had “banned not only the enrollment of gay and lesbian students but also the enrollment of straights who support gays and gay rights.” How’s that for “true diversity”?

The school’s policy changed slightly this year: “No longer are straights who support gay issues banned from attending OBU, but GLBT people remain unable to attend openly.” But that change didn’t set well with some “Christian” lawmakers in Oklahoma:

while the riders were making inroads with students at the university, in Oklahoma City the state school board was overturning a policy protecting gay students from discrimination from teachers.

 

The previous policy stated that teachers could not “deny benefits to any student” or “grant any advantage to any student” based on sexual orientation. The new policy reads, “the teacher shall comply with all federal and state anti-discrimination laws.” Federal and state laws do not protect students on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. …

How devious and just plain bigoted can you get? And speaking of devious bigots, Lou Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition didn’t want to be left out of any anti-gay activities. Since he doesn’t have his own university, he’s calling upon the flock to support Higher Education Act (H.R. 609), legislation spearheaded by David Horowitz whose real goal is to destroy “academic freedom” and “diversity” by encouraging and enabling ultra-conservatives and religious fundamentalists to strike out – legally and with impunity – at anyone who disagrees with them or challenges their far-right ideology. Section 103 of H.R. 609 “is designed to prohibit colleges receiving federal funds from denying students benefits or discriminating against them because of their political or religious beliefs.” (Check out the new “Conservative Tees” ad on Horowitz’s FrontPageMag.com website, then look up the word “hypocrite.”)

“Political or religious beliefs.” Horowitz, Sheldon and the rest of the Christian Right like that wording because it allows them to encourage discrimination and harassment based on sexual orientation. A recent example came from the Burlington Free Press:

An Outright Vermont presentation at Williston Central School was canceled Thursday morning shortly before it was set to start after parents questioned school administrators' decision to invite the gay-lesbian youth group to the school.

 

Several parents complained during a community forum before Outright’s scheduled talks to student teams at the school. School administrators responded by pulling the plug on the talks. This left several hundred students who were waiting to hear Outright’s anti-bullying workshop with no presentation, said Kate Jerman, co-executive director of Outright.

 

She said she is disappointed that a small group of parents derailed the talks. In doing so, they gave students the impression that harassment based on sexual orientation is not a topic that should be discussed at school, Jerman said.

 

“The message they got was clearly this isn’t an OK thing to talk about. That’s a lot of damage to the school climate from one very small action.”

Do you think there’s any connection between the Christian Right’s social, religious, political and legal anti-gay activities and increased attacks against gays, and increased fear among gay and lesbian students?

“Homophobic Bullying Drives Teen To Suicide.” One report documented that gay and lesbian students are “In Harm’s Way” in the New York City public schools. Another study documented that “Schools Remain Unsafe For Gay Students.” A January 29, 2006 article noted “Anti-gay bullying under investigation: Harassment may have played role in South Florida school violence case.”

Still another report cited student comments: “We were picked on. We were called ‘queer’ and ‘faggot’ and a host of other homophobic slurs. We were also used as punching bags by our classmates, just for being different.” The same report documented that “97% of students in public high schools report regularly hearing homophobic remarks from their peers. … The typical high school student hears anti-gay slurs 25.5 times a day. … 80% of gay and lesbian youth report severe social isolation.”

Do you think there’s any connection between the Christian Right’s social, religious, political and legal anti-gay activities and the fact that there’s “Widespread Police Abuse Against Gay Americans”?

A report released Thursday [March 23, 2006] by Amnesty International details widespread homophobia – including the use of torture – by American police officers against gays, lesbians and the transgendered.



 

The report says that thousands of LGBT people across the country are victims of a system that fuels discrimination and facilitates torture, ill-treatment and impunity.

 

The report "Stonewalled – Still demanding respect" is based on interviews conducted by Amnesty International between 2003 and 2005 with members of the LGBT community, victims of gender-based violence, survivors of police abuse, activists, lawyers and law enforcement officials across the US.

 

“The interviews reveal a very clear and worrying pattern. Cases of beatings, sexual violence, verbal abuse, harassment and humiliation by law enforcement officials against LGBT people take place on any given day in detention centers, prisons, in the home, and on the street,” said Amnesty in a media statement accompanying the report. [links added]

John D. Moore, author of Confusing Love With Obsession: When You Can’t Stop Controlling Your Partner and the Relationship and professor of health sciences and psychology at American Public University, does and said so in a March 8, 2004 Advocate.com article:

When President George W. Bush decided to publicly embrace a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, cloaking his remarks in the guise of religion, he psychologically violated millions upon millions of gay and lesbian youth around the nation as well as the many millions more who are their parents and relatives. In short, Mr. Bush has made it fashionable to declare “open season” on a segment of our society. Make no mistake – his intolerant message was quite clear: “You and your family are not part of the American family.” …

 

Consider what one 20-year-old student wrote in an essay about this topic in a class I instruct on gender psychology: “I have beaten up faggots before, and I used to feel guilty – not  anymore! Bush says fags don’t count, so I guess it’s cool to do it.” … [links added]
 

---