The Greatest Civil Liberties Violation in America: Democrats
 

December 19 2005
Counterbias.com
by Ted Baiamonte
R E P U B L I C A N   V I E W


This week the Democrats have scored another huge point. Sadly, that point is a Democratic point, which is to say it is a stupid point at best and dangerous at worst. It seems President Bush, with thorough oversight from the Democrats, authorized the NSA to spy on Al Qaeda members inside the United States. And, the Democrats scored again by holding up the renewal of the Patriot Act primarily because it allowed the government access to Al-Qaeda's library records.

So what is the real reason the Democrats seem so eager to help Al Qaeda? There are two reasons: they like America and Republicans even less than they like Al Qaeda. Bleeding heart Democrats were once known to be pro criminal, and now they are know to be pro terrorist. They were and to a large, but quieter, extent still are pro criminal because they believed an evil, capitalist, individualistic, Republican America produced criminals, and so they did everything they could to coddle criminals and blame America for producing them. Fortunately, as crime then rose, the Democrats descended. But now the Democrats are back at the same concept with their pro-terrorist theme.

Of course, if you ask a Democrat why they are pro terrorist they won't say much. What they will say is: "we live on a slippery slope", or "don't ask for whom the bell tolls." Interestingly, these are sentiments with which freedom loving Republicans have much sympathy. If Jeffersonian America stands primarily for freedom from government then of course Republicans are skeptical about a government newly empowered to look at even terrorists' library records, or listen to their phone calls. Government, in its diabolical way, might then feel free to look at everyone's library records and phone calls, and then do what ever horrible things big government has always done throughout the world history our Framers knew so well.

But, all of America lives on a slippery slope all of the time. For example, we can't disband the military or police forces on the civil libertarian ground that one day they will take over America. We can't let criminals free on the grounds that one day the police will lock us all up as criminals. We can't stop government from building roads and bridges on the ground that one day, in their corrupt way, they'll pave over all of America or build a million bridges to nowhere with our tax dollars. We can't prohibit them from printing money on the ground that they might one day flood the world with a Weimarian supply of it. We can't ban heterosexual marriage on the ground that one day it might lead to homosexual marriage. In short, while our framers knew that government is naturally stupid, corrupt, and deadly, they also knew that a limited form of it was necessary, might function reasonably, and, given their Republican Constitution, might not grow to the deadly leviathan proportions they feared more than anything.

Sadly, the Democrats never bought the American dream of freedom. They have morphed the government into the very leviathan the Jeffersonian framers feared. So why then would the Democrats pretend to be so fearful of a tiny increase in government power (looking at terrorists' library records, for example) when that has been their subversive and only goal throughout all of American history? Answer: our framers brilliantly brainwashed all of us to worship at the civil liberties alter and Democrats are now shamelessly exploiting that in the knowledge that most Americans don't know that the Democrats themselves are the perfect objectification of a massive civil liberties catastrophe. They openly provide an Aspirin with a seemingly caring hand while secretly administering a deadly poison with the other.

If the Democrats really care about civil liberties why don't they become Republicans? Why on earth worry about the library records of a few terrorist who would merrily dance in the streets at the sight of us dying slowing in a chemical or biological attack? Why not worry that every American individual and business must hand over complete financial records to the government each year at tax time? If we had, for example, a value added tax, about 150 million individuals and businesses would be free of an intimate and extensive relationship with the government that Democrats, seemingly, love, regardless of its staggering inefficiency and the massive civil liberties violation it represents. This comparatively huge and anti-America manifestation of government power is much loved by Democrats because it is part of the Socialist puzzle they have been piecing together for two hundred years.

The Democrats' concern with civil liberties is to simply exploit them, despite the potential deadly consequences, for short term political gain while knowing full well that the Democratic Party's very existence makes a mockery of the civil liberties concept.

==

Ted Baiamonte is author of "Understanding the Difference Between Democrats and Republicans". His blog is The Dumb Democrat, and he can be reached at bje1000@aol.com.