Changing the Tone
 

June 21 2005
Counterbias.com
Scott C. Smith
  

“The spirit of cooperation I have seen in this hall is what is needed in Washington, D.C. It is the challenge of our moment. After a difficult election, we must put politics behind us and work together to make the promise of America available for every one of our citizens. I am optimistic that we can change the tone in Washington, D.C.”

-- President George W. Bush, speech, Dec. 13, 2000.

“That background may lack the polish of Washington. Then again, I don't have a lot of things that come with Washington. I don't have enemies to fight. I have no stake in the bitter arguments of the last few years. I want to change the tone of Washington to one of civility and respect.”

-- President George W. Bush, speech, August 3, 2000.

"We may not always agree, but hopefully, we can be honest with each other, and respect each other, and change the tone of Washington, D.C., so that when people look at the Nation's Capital they will be proud of what they see.

"Changing the tone of our Nation's Capital hasn't been easy. I realize that in politics, old ways die hard. Washington at times has got a plenty sharp edge to it. The only thing I can do, and the only thing Dick Cheney and others in our administration can do is to control our own responses. When I hear my policies and my nominees attacked in a hostile and partisan way, I simply hear the echoes of an era behind us.

"I'm not going to take the bait. I'm going to lead this country to a new level of respect. I came to this town to change the tone of the capital. And I'm not going to quit."

-- President George W. Bush, speech, May 22, 2001

"On issue after issue they (Democrats) stand for nothing except obstruction... political parties that choose the path of obstruction will not gain the trust of the American people.''

-- President George W. Bush, speech, June 16 (Bloomberg News).

“At an evening congressional gala in Washington, Bush drew applause by calling for an overhaul of the tax code, a national energy bill and permanent tax relief, among other things. He accused Democrats of trying to block all of them.

"'They stand for nothing except obstruction, and this is not leadership,' Bush said. 'It is the philosophy of the stop sign, the agenda of the road block, and the country and our children deserve better.'”

-- President George W. Bush, speech, June 15, reported by the Associated Press.

It's safe to say that Bush's 2000 campaign promise to bring civility back to Washington has been abandoned. No surprises there, considering the promises broken by this president.

Of course, the political climate today is decidedly poisonous, with both sides attacking each other.

And while a handful of Democrats have attacked Bush, it has been Republicans, and the conservative pundits, that have done all they can to vilify Democrats and liberals. They claim we're terrorist sympathizers and that we're guilty of treason for speaking out against the war in Iraq. They claim we're on a campaign to persecute Christians and to destroy "traditional" family values by attempting to "legitimize" gay marriage. 

The pundits write books: Ann Coulter, a frequent guest on shows like Fox's Hannity and Colmes, has written a number of books slamming liberals; Sean Hannity also writes books, and includes titles that say "Deliver Us From Evil...defeating...Depotism and Liberalism." As if liberals were a group that needed to be destroyed. Michael Savage's latest book likens liberalism to a mental illness.

On cable news, conservatives are often free to spew hatred with little opposition. Hannity and Colmes is a perfect example of this dynamic. It's not an exaggeration that at times the show will feature one or two (or three) right-wing guests "debating" with a lone liberal guest. Alan Colmes, when defending liberals or Democrats, is not nearly as aggressive as Hannity. The often-passive Colmes, even during the rare occasions when he gets riled up, doesn't come close to the  hatred espoused by Hannity.

Hannity's technique for a liberal guest is to barrage them with questions or statements and demand a response. He has a number of pet liberals (including Colmes) he likes, such as "liberal" Fox News contributor Susan Estritch, who more likely than not will agree with Hannity. So much for "fair and balanced."

It's time for Democrats, liberals and progressives to take a stand against the onslaught of liberal hatred by Republican politicians and pundits. Liberals like to take a beating, it seems, at the hands of conservatives. 

Many liberals believe it is better to take the high road and not sink to the level of a conservative who can scream about how liberals hate America. It's not better.

We need to defend ourselves and aggressively promote an agenda. Democrats in Congress seem to spend most of their time on defense against Republicans, rather than coming together to put forth a bold agenda on what direction to take America. Polls support the idea that Americans are not happy with the direction Bush is taking the country. (In some polls that number was about 60%.) Democrats have a chance of taking a step towards removing the Republican majority in the 2006 mid-term elections. With bold leadership and clear ideas on how to make America better, we may just make it happen. Here's hoping it will.
 

---