Military Policy on
Gays is Costly and Dangerous
March 16
2005
Counterbias.com
Gene C. Gerard
The military spent over $200 million to recruit and train
personnel to replace service members discharged over the last decade
for being openly gay, according to a
Congressional report that was just released. The report found that
over 10,000 troops were discharged for violating the “Don’t Ask,
Don’t Tell” policy that was
instituted in 1993 under President Clinton. The policy allows
military personnel to serve only if they do not disclose their
homosexuality to anyone, including family
members.
The estimate of $200 million was conservative, at best. The report
only reviewed enlisted personnel who were discharged, and did not
include the figures for replacing officers. Additionally, the report
only contained the estimates of the Army, Navy, and the Air Force.
The Marines declined to participate in the study. The report also
did not consider the costs of investigating and discharging the
personnel, nor did it contain the costs of processing legal
challenges and reviews of the dismissals.
It has always been known that the military’s policy on gays was
illogical at best, and discriminatory at worst. But this new report
shows that it has also been extremely costly. But the cost of
discharging gays is not just in financial terms. Some of those
discharged have held skills sorely needed in today’s military. Over
90 nuclear power engineers, 150 rocket and missile specialists, and
49 nuclear, chemical, and biological warfare specialists have been
discharged.
Since last summer, the Pentagon has called up over 5,600 specially
trained members of the Individual Ready Reserve, former soldiers who
have completed their military service and do not participate in
ongoing training. Requiring these service members to re-enlist has
accurately been called a “back-door draft.” The Defense Department
said this is necessary because of the shortage of troops in Iraq and
Afghanistan. But to some extent, this necessity has been created by
the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.
Twenty-one infantry soldiers have been called up from the Ready
Reserve, but over 340 of these soldiers have been discharged for
homosexuality. Similarly, the Army
needed three more foreign language interrogators in Iraq and
Afghanistan last year, yet 15 have been discharged. Over 50
intelligence operatives have been discharged from the Army, but they
reported a shortage of 33 operatives. Over 72 military law
enforcement personnel, primarily police officers and prison guards,
have been called up owing to a shortage of these specially trained
troops. The Abu Ghraib prison scandal glaringly demonstrated the
need for competent, well-trained prison guards. Yet over 163 law
enforcement personnel have been discharged.
Most significant has been the discharge of much needed foreign
language experts. Between 1998 and 2004, at least 88 language
specialists were expelled from the military for being gay; no less
than 20 were proficient in Middle Eastern languages. At least 37
were discharged since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
This has placed the country, and our troops, at great risk.
The 9/11 Commission noted that the U.S. “lacked sufficient
translators proficient in Arabic and other key languages, resulting
in significant backlog of untranslated intercepts.” And as recently
as last summer, the intelligence community acknowledged that due to
a shortage of translators, the average timeframe to translate a
suspect communication is 30 days. The Pentagon’s Defense Science
Board recently warned that America “is without a working channel of
communications to the world of Muslims and Islam.”
The strain on the military, as a result of deployments to Iraq and
Afghanistan, is the most severe it has been since the Vietnam War.
In February, the Pentagon announced that five of the six military
reserve components failed to meet recruitment goals for the previous
four months. The Marines failed to meet their recruitment goal in
January, the first time in a decade that this has occurred. The Army
National Guard has missed its recruitment goal for the first quarter
of 2005 by 24 percent. Given the shortages, the continued dismissal
of military personnel based solely on sexual orientation is contrary
to protecting the country.
Twenty-four nations allow gay individuals to openly serve in the
military. And the U.S. armed forces has ample evidence that doing so
has not created the problems they fear. Although not widely
reported, an article was published in 2003 in Parameters, a
publication of the U.S. Army, which reviewed the experiences of
foreign military allies who abolished their ban on gay personnel.
The article concluded that there was no negative impact on unit
cohesion, morale, retention, or recruitment.
American troops have been serving with gay British soldiers in Iraq
for the past 18 months. British military authorities have noted that
there have been no problems. The British navy is so pleased with gay
personnel that they are now actively recruiting gays and lesbians.
Part of this effort includes allowing gay couples to live in housing
previously reserved for married couples. Royal Navy Commodore Paul
Docherty said they want to change the military’s culture so that
gays will feel comfortable working there.
Congressman Marty Meehan of Massachusetts introduced the Military
Readiness Enhancement Act in the House of Representatives on March
2. The act will repeal the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. It’s time
to do so. We should never have discriminated against young men and
women who want to serve honorably. And we cannot continue to put the
nation’s security, and our troops, at risk.