|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
The
American President
Election 2004
is finally over, and George W. Bush has emerged the winner. How did it
happen? By any
measurement of presidential success or failure, Bush should not have
won. He had no major
domestic programs to campaign on, the economy was struggling, job
creation was slow, and oil prices had reached record highs. Bush,
however, is an expert politician. Or, rather, his handlers are expert politicians. Karl Rove and
Bush’s political team were responsible for creating the Bush
presidential persona, a persona that resonated with Middle America. Under controlled and scripted situations, Bush was charming,
engaging, and seemed to generally care for his supporters. Despite having blood as blue as John Kerry’s, coming from
the same kind of wealthy background (exclusive prep school,
Ivy-league education), Bush’s image was more blue-collar that John
Kerry. Despite his personal fortune, Bush’s public image was that
of a guy you might have as your neighbor. On vacation, Bush was usually photographed at his Crawford
ranch, dressed in cowboy gear, engaged in regular-guy chores. Perception
was the key to Bush’s win. Bush
voters based their votes primarily on the perception that Bush would
protect them from terrorist attacks, and the perception that Bush
embraced specific moral values. John Kerry,
on the other hand, was perceived as a wealthy elitist, someone who
could not be trusted with the security of the United States (as if
George W. Bush stands watch at the White House, rifle in hand, ready
to fend off terrorists, Arnold Schwarzenegger style).
Kerry’s free time was spent in activities such as
snowboarding or windsurfing, living the good life of wealth and
prestige, disconnected from the middle-class and unable to identify
with their needs. The attacks
of September 11, 2001, ended up being the best thing to happen to
George W. Bush. Behind
the scenes, Bush was dressed up for the role of war-time president,
in shirt-sleeves at ground zero, bullhorn in hand, speaking to the
New York fire fighters. Bush was in
Florida when America was attacked, visiting an elementary school. And in footage made infamous by Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit
9/11, Americans were able to see the real George W. Bush in an
unscripted moment: as the children in the Booker Elementary School
classroom read aloud, the second plane hit the Twin Towers.
Andrew Card, Bush’s chief of staff, is seen in the video
approaching Bush and whispering in his ear: “America is under
attack.” And what did
Bush do? Nothing. This footage
of Bush in the classroom following being told by Card can be found
easily on the Internet. We
see Bush holding a book, My Pet Goat, a grimace on his face,
waiting for instructions on what to do next. Meanwhile, in New York City, workers at the Twin Towers were
leaping to their deaths. The man
responsible for the September 11 attacks, Osama bin Laden, remains
at large to this day. The
network Al-Jazeera aired a new tape from bin Laden, and the man Bush
once wanted brought to justice, Old West style, mocked the
Commander-in-Chief: “Before Bush and his administration would pay
attention and we never thought that the high commander of the U.S.
armies would leave 50 thousand of his citizens in both towers to
face the horrors by themselves…it seemed to distract his attention
from listening to the girl telling him about her goat
butting…which gave us three times the time to execute the
operation.” Bush seems to
exist in a protective bubble, free from criticism. Bush’s handlers have made sure that anytime the Bush
administration blunders, Bush is not hit with the fallout. Is George W.
Bush really going to protect America in a way that John Kerry could
not? No, he’s not. To this day America remains at risk from terrorist attack,
despite the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and its
one major accomplishment, the creation of a color-coded terrorist
threat level indicator. In campaign
stump speeches, Vice President Dick Cheney made sure to terrify his
base with worst-case scenarios, should John Kerry be elected. In a speech on October 21 in Carroll, Ohio, Cheney said,
“The biggest threat we face now as a nation is the possibility of
terrorists ending up in the middle of one of our cities with
deadlier weapons than have ever before been used against us --
biological agents or a nuclear weapon or a chemical weapon of some
kind to be able to threaten the lives of hundreds of thousands of
Americans." If the Bush
administration has done such a great job of protecting America, how
could the scenario Cheney describe even happen? The answer is simple: team Bush has done nothing to protect
us from that kind of attack. Maybe
the Bush administration will get around to it in the next four
years. I’ve heard
conservatives say that they feel safe under the leadership of George
W. Bush. The fact that
Osama bin Laden remains at large, frankly, does not fill me with a
sense of security. Bush
famously said in 2002 that he was not concerned with capturing bin
Laden: “Well,
as I say, we haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily
say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't
know where he is. I -- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not
that concerned about him.” |
|
|
|||||||||||
...read more by Scott C. Smith
Printer-friendly
version
Write
Letter to Editor
C O U N T E R L I N K : Articles : Columnists : Book Review : 8 Questions : Letters : Contact : About : Links : Blog
© 2004 CounterBias.com