|
Printer-Friendly
version
Write
Letter to Editor
|
|
George
W. Bush's Iraq
September 29 2004
Counterbias.com
Scott C. Smith
"I'm pleased
with the progress (in Iraq)," President George W. Bush said on
Sept. 18 to a Maine newspaper. "It's hard. Don't get me wrong.
It's hard because there are some in Iraq who want to disrupt the
election and disrupt the march to democracy, which should speak to
their fear of freedom."
What is Bush smoking? Is he hitting the bottle? What the hell is he
talking about? What progress? Iraq is in utter chaos right now. What
progress is he pleased with? That kidnappers continue to take
hostages and decapitate them? The non-stop fighting in Fallujah? The
near-daily deaths of American troops?
When Michael Moore's film Fahrenheit 9/11 was released,
conservative pundits who did not actually see the documentary seized
on one moment which, to them, demonstrated that Moore somehow
supported Saddam Hussein: a scene in Iraq with children playing, men
getting haircuts, and people going about daily activities. The
conservative pundits are, of course, too obtuse to actually
understand the point Moore was trying to make: Iraqis, even under a
brutal dictator like Saddam Hussein, tried to live their lives under
horrible conditions. Moore was attempting to humanize ordinary
Iraqis, by showing them doing things we all do. Conservatives were
too stupid to understand this and blasted Moore for his
"idyllic" portrayal of an Iraqi "paradise" under
Saddam Hussein.
Yet now we have George W. Bush telling us all that we're making
"progress" in Iraq, a progress he's "pleased"
with. In a Sept. 15 speech to the National Guard Association in Las
Vegas, Bush said, "Despite ongoing violence in Iraq...that
country now has a strong prime minister, a national council and
national elections are scheduled for January. The world is changing
for the better."
Changing for the better? How? Does he think scores of car bombings
equate a change for the better? Does he consider the deaths of 1,048
Americans a change for the better? Would the thousands of injured
soldiers agree that we're making progress in Iraq? Is it progress
that insurgents have taken control of cities like Fallujah? What
about the thousands of dead Iraqi civilians? That's progress?
Bush and his supporters clearly consider the American public to be
rubes, to be so stupid that we all would just forget that the
original reason to invade Iraq was to disarm Saddam of his WMDs. And
then we changed the mission to removing a brutal dictator, and now
the mission is to fight the terrorists. Osama Bin who? We don't
care. We'll get the terrorists that attacked us...Eventually. In the
meantime, we need to spend billions of dollars to ensure that Iraqis
get quality medical care. Socialism, bad for America, good for Iraq.
What about the terrorists who attacked us on Sept. 11? Unless my
memory is faulty, I don't recall that they hailed from Iraq. But no,
Bush has to have his deadly snipe hunt in Iraq. A snipe hunt that
has left scores of young men disabled, brain damaged, blind and
paralyzed, their lives changed completely due to faulty intelligence
that, as Colin Powell told the U.N. Security Council in Feb. 2003,
was not assertion but fact. That mistake has resulted in the deaths
of over 12,000 Iraqi civilians. You know, the people we were trying
to free from a brutal regime.
How many more decapitations will it take for Bush to admit that our
initial intelligence on Iraq WMDs was bad? How many more young men
will have their limbs blown off before Bush admits there are no WMDs
in Iraq? How many more families will be destroyed before Bush admits
he has no idea where the WMDs are?
Speaking of decapitations,
the Associated Press reported on September 27 that in Baghdad,
videos of the horrific decapitations have replaced pornography as the
must-have item. The
videos sell for as little as thirty cents.
"We are paying a lot of sacrifices. We are
suffering a lot in Iraq," Interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi
said September 19 on ABC's This Week.
Prime Minister Allawi flip-flopped two days later in a press
conference: “We are winning, defeating terrorists in Iraq.
Unfortunately the media have not been covering these significant
gains in Iraq," he said. I’m
guessing Allawi’s comments on September 19 more accurately reflect
the reality in Iraq than the rosy picture he painted with President
Bush two days later.
I guess Americans don't care what happens in Iraq as long as we're
fat, dumb and happy, mesmerized by Dan Rather's "memogate"
or the latest attack on John Kerry by the Swift Boat Vets. The Bush
administration is counting on our complacency, that we will simply
ignore what is happening in Iraq. So what if hundreds of billions of
tax dollars are going to the reconstruction of Iraq? I can turn on
the TV and catch the latest episode of The Apprentice.
Ignorance is bliss, especially when your name is George W. Bush.
|
|
|