|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Straight Eye For The Queer Guy... and Gal
Gays have the
right to marry. There is
no argument. There is no
issue of morality. And
more importantly, gay marriage is in absolutely no way a threat to
traditional, heterosexual marriages. Get over it! The
Sanctity of it all “Same-sex
marriage will destroy the sanctity of the institution of marriage." Bullshit! As Senator
Barbara Boxer explained, if our marriages are in trouble because our
neighbor next door or down the street is allowed to marry his or her
same-sex partner, we’ve got more important personal issues to attend
to. Why does it
matter to us if Ann and Jan or Larry and Barry are married to each
other? Let’s face
it, heterosexuals, we haven’t exactly been the best custodians of
the sanctity of marriage. We
are known to abuse, lie to, and cheat on our spouses -- and we get
divorces. In some
cases, we heteros even murder our significant others for insurance
money, or because we want to be with a stripper instead; or both. This new found 'love' for the institution of marriage is
nothing more than hypocrisy. There is no
real moral reason to ban same-sex marriage.
End of story. Ignorance and
Stupidity
Conservatives
are pushing for a Constitutional amendment because of their ignorance
of what the Constitution of the United States of America stands for.
The Constitution is a living document made to define and give
rights to Americans, not take them away.
You may or may
not realize this, but it has only been in the last 10 years that
people of different ethnic backgrounds could legally marry in some
states. Some of the same opponents of gay marriage are probably still
a little ticked-off about that too. Opponents of
gay marriage seem to think our traditional marriages are going to lose
value if gay couples are afforded the same rights as we are.
Here’s some
advice: Take some responsibility for your own marriage.
That’s the only way your marriage has any real value, anyway.
If your marriage loses its sanctity because gays are able to
marry, it probably didn’t have it in the first place. If
you’re so worried about the gay couple down the street,
maybe you have some demons or perhaps even tendencies that you’re
worried about. A
confident
heterosexual man shouldn’t be worried whether or not two homosexual
men or women are married, in love, living together. I
singled out
men because, so far, the loudest voices I’ve heard against same-sex
marriage have been us – the macho
men. Same for banning
abortion, ironically. How stupid can
we get, guys? How does
what two consenting adults do together have anything to do with you,
me or anyone else? Whose
rights are being violated by allowing same-sex marriage, anyway? “My right
not to see two men walking down the street holding hands with wedding
bands on. That’s what
right is being violated!” Here’s
another compassion lesson. First off… it
ain’t always about you! My
wife and I spend a lot of time in the gym and are in fairly good
shape. What if we were
offended about how out of shape you and your wife might look?
No one’s proposing a constitutional amendment to ban
overweight couples from getting married.
Or unattractive couples… Or nerdy couples… Or couples where
one person has curly hair and the other has straight hair… You get the
point. I hope.
It’s just like anything else – television, radio.
If you don’t like what you’re looking at, look at something
else. What offends me
may not necessarily offend you or the next guy.
Just because you don’t agree with something doesn’t mean it
doesn’t deserve equal protection.
I absolutely and categorically do not agree with anything the
Ku Klux Klan has to say, but I will defend their right to say it, even
though, as an African-American, I find it incredibly offensive!
I don’t agree with Louis Farrakhan either, but he’s got the
right to speak his opinions. We have the
right to disagree with anything.
However, we do not have the right to stifle or prohibit
something simply because we do not like or do not agree with it. Just look at
the history of civil rights in this country.
African-Americans were slaves.
Someone thought this was a concept worth fighting for.
Women have only had the right to vote within the last 80 years
in some states. Do you know how
these things came to change? By
amending the Constitution to grant
basic human rights to members of the citizenry who did not have
them before. The only
time amendments to the Constitution revoke rights are when those
rights infringe on the rights of others… like slavery and keeping
blacks and women from voting. Our right not
to see or hear something that offends us cannot be infringed because
we can always choose to look or listen elsewhere.
Nobody’s
forcing anyone to have a
same-sex marriage. We
will still be as free as we ever were to marry and divorce as many
members of the opposite sex as we wish.
You might want
to re-visit those tendencies I mentioned earlier if you protest too
much louder, though. Finally, who the
hell died and made you God?
Why does anyone
have the right to determine whether or not gay men and women can marry
their significant others? My bad… I
forget that God called George to be President and as it has often been
reported, his decisions do come from On
High. God told George
to keep those homos from gettin’ hitched!
And by God, George'll be goddamned if he doesn’t try! Even if it does only serve to further polarize the country in the hopes of saving his presidency. Has
any married heterosexual out there ever found himself or herself
arguing with his or her spouse about how gay rights are ruining the
marriage? My wife and I
have argued about a lot of things and not one time has the spectre of
gay marriage ever been the source of friction. The
real threat to the sanctity of is adultery.
I don’t hear anyone pushing for a Constitutional ammendment
to ban philandering. The
one thing my wife and I argue most about is money – or the lack of
it. Somehow, I just don’t see amending the Constitution to ban gay marriage as any radical economic reform either. |
|
|
||||||||||||
Printer-friendly
version
Write
Letter to Editor
C O U N T E R L I N K : Articles : Columnists : Book Review : 8 Questions : Letters : Contact : About : Links : Blog
© 2004 CounterBias.com