|
|
Moral Relativism: It's Not Just For Liberals Anymore
Moral
relativism is a concept that right-wingers frequently accuse liberals
of. Basically it's living
life not governed by the rules of morality; making up the rules as you
go along. Conservatives
seem to think that only they live their lives based on a strict code
of morals and ethics. Which
is simply not true. Sean
Hannity is a great example of hypocrisy on this issue.
If you've ever had the misfortune to listen to one of Hannity's
rants, chances are at some point he'll bring up Bill Clinton.
The man just cannot help himself.
He can be talking about how much he enjoyed the new Harry
Potter movie and somehow connect Bill Clinton to it. There
are way too many instances of Hannity registering his disgust over
Bill Clinton. Here's one
example, from Hannity and Colmes, June 10, 2003.
The subject of the conversation is Bill Clinton: rapist. Yes, rapist. See,
in Sean's world, no one can say anything bad about George W. Bush, but
it's okay to indirectly accuse a former president of rape. But that's our Sean for you. About
Clinton and his accusers, Hannity said, "I'm going to move on.
But to believe her (rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick) or the
known perjurer, you have to believe all of these women (the other
women that accused Bill Clinton of rape -- charges that were never
found to be true in a court of law) are lying...I find it amazing that
people will defend him (Bill Clinton) to any length." Man,
Sean really hates Bill Clinton! And
the fact that Bill Clinton lied about a sexual relationship to a grand
jury just frosts Hannity's fur. On
another show, Hannity interviewed former Clinton legal counsel Lanny
Davis on June 3, 1999. Once
again Hannity honed in on the liar, Clinton: "Lanny,
you took a number of gratuitous shots at Ken Starr…you were taking
shots at him, felt what he was doing was wrong, felt the questions
he'd be asking the president were wrong and I just -- you can't get
away from the fact, the president lied under oath. You're an attorney.
The president coached his secretary. You know he coached his
secretary. We don't have to go through this whole thing again here.
The president got impeached for these things. These are crimes. This is the chief law enforcement officer of the
country." As
Hannity rightly points out, lying to a grand jury is illegal.
It's a crime. Lying
bad! Sex bad! That's Sean's message. Time
for a quick game. Our
mystery guest was the center of controversy in the 1980s, a man
convicted of the following crimes:
Yikes!
That's much worse than lying about sex.
Yes, it's Sean's good friend, Oliver North.
Convicted for his involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal.
Luckily for North, the charges were later dismissed.
How can it be that Sean Hannity is so outraged over a lie about sex,
and not outraged over someone who not only lied to Congress but also
destroyed evidence? Because
Hannity is a hypocrite, that's why.
That's moral relativism in action. Is
it of little surprise that Hannity is also good friends with Newt
Gingrich, a man who, like Bill Clinton, had an affair?
It’s okay with Gingrich does it, since Newt is a Republican,
and Republicans are not subject to Hannity’s shifting moral codes. Another
figure associated with conservative morality is William J. Bennett,
the man known to “traditional” Americans as the Virtues Czar,
author of the Book of Virtues and other tomes on morality and
ethics. One problem: as Bennett lectured America on issues of
morality, the man was hitting the slots in Atlantic City and Las
Vegas. And how did
conservatives defend Bennett’s gambling?
He never spoke out against gambling.
That was the excuse. And
although the Bible says nothing about gambling, most Christians
understand that gambling is a sinful activity, and Bennett has
presented himself to Americans as a Christian. Bennett
is lucky he has such a good friend in Sean Hannity. Hannity came to Bennett’s defense on the August 12, 2003 Hannity
and Colmes: “You know something? I don't think you did anything wrong…and as
much as this, Bill. What you did was in public, you weren't betting
the milk money, you could afford it. I mean, you made a lot of money
in your life. It's not like, you know, you're mortgaging your house to
do stuff.” Well,
that’s a relief. I will
admit that I too have gambled at casinos.
There’s a reason that Las Vegas is called Sin City,
and it has something to do with the fact that there’s a lot of
immoral activity going on. The
perfect setting for the Czar of Virtue to blow his money. |
|
Printer-friendly
version
Write
Letter to Editor
C O U N T E R L I N K : Articles
: Columnists : Book
Review : 8 Questions : Briefs
: Contact : About
: Links :
© 2004 CounterBias.com