|
|
Bush and Al-Qaeda: A Symbiotic Relationship
George W. Bush needs Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda.
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda need George W. Bush.
Nonsense? Maybe
not. Some believe that the bombings in Madrid this March had a
direct effect on the Spanish presidential election. The logic behind that being: the citizenry of Spain decided
that they were attacked because of Spain siding with the United States
in Iraq. In other words, elect someone else that doesn’t kneel to King George. Similarly,
there are those who believe the same could happen in the U.S.
It has been suggested that should al-Qaeda
strike inside the
United States prior to the election this year, the American electorate
might follow Spain’s lead. It
has even been said that bin Laden wants John Kerry to win.
Really? That all sounds like right-wing smoke-screen/scare tactics
all rolled into one ominous pile of Texas Longhorn bullshit to me! In case you’ve been in a fog since 9/11, the Bush gang
have played the bin Laden/terror alert card whenever they need to fan
the flames of fear. Generally
speaking, the fear mongering happens when Bush either needs to drum up
support for a policy or when he’s in trouble.
Like now. Maybe
the recent terror warnings are valid, maybe they aren’t.
But as many have pointed out, it looks rather suspicious, not
to mention confusing, for Attorney General John Ashcroft to hold a
press conference to announce that we’re about to be hit again, after
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge has said that
there was no new intelligence that was more significant than what
he’s seen before. There are many - too many - who will blindly follow this
president down whatever path he takes.
This is most definitely a “buffalo jump” as fellow Counterbias
scribe Dennis Jones described in a recent article.
Shrubya’s people know that all they have to do to get a large
portion of the masses behind him/them is to play the fear card. It’s worked pretty well so far. That’s why Bush needs his elusive spectre.
Bush used bin Laden/al-Qaeda
to drum up support for the Patriot
Act. Bush used bin Laden/al-Qaeda
to gain additional powers from Congress.
Bush used bin Laden/al-Qaeda
to justify war in Iraq.
And now, Bush is using bin Laden/al-Qaeda
in an attempt to
shore up his sagging poll numbers.
If there were no bin Laden or
al-Qaeda, the Bushites would have
to conjure up something else for us to fear.
At the RNC Convention this summer, it wouldn’t surprise me,
or many others, to see the Republicans parade bin Laden out in
shackles to proclaim that “President Bush always gets his man!”
At the same time, they’d say, “You better vote for us…
the danger is still out there. We’re
the ones protecting you. See?” This summer and fall, it isn’t unfathomable to think
Bush's Administration will use these and other tactics to scare the
populous into voting in its favor.
Indeed, they already have by insinuating that voting for John
Kerry is what Osama bin Laden wants.
I doubt that very seriously, because al-Qaeda
has benefited
significantly with King George at the helm. With America under the expert
leadership of George W. Bush, al-Qaeda has enjoyed a substantial
swelling of its ranks, according to a recent study.
According to the International Institute of Strategic Studies, al-Qaeda
is now 18,000 potential terrorists strong.
I think bin Laden and al-Qaeda owe George W. Bush a huge debt
of gratitude. Without
Georgey-boy’s global follies, beginning with Afghanistan, al-Qaeda
might actually have been neutralized.
Instead, Bush has been the poster-boy for recruitment to the
terrorist organization. Osama bin Laden wants John Kerry to be president of the United States? Get real! Even though Kerry would probably finish what Bush started in Iraq, the global atmosphere would change dramatically. A Kerry Administration would be more insightful and less inciting. If we elect a president who is truly compassionate, which I believe Kerry is, a president that can admit when mistakes and missteps have been made, we may begin to regain the global credibility and respect that we’ve lost under the Bush Administration. |
|
Printer-friendly
version
Write
Letter to Editor
C O U N T E R L I N K : Articles
: Columnists : Book
Review : 8 Questions : Briefs
: Contact : About
: Links :
© 2004 CounterBias.com