|
Ashcroft
Deserves To Be Sued
Jan 28 2004
Counterbias.com
Robert
Furs
I’m
sure we were all touched and mired in deep gratitude when the
US
government promised to let our government know before sending our
non-terrorist citizens off to be tortured in a nation known for inhumane
treatment of prisoners. Somehow, this unbelievably weak agreement had
been painted as one of the biggest achievements between President Bush
and Prime Minister Martin on their first meeting.
You
can just imagine how incredibly important and successful an epiphany
this agreement was to US-Canada relations, and fundamental human rights
in general. Well, not quite.
The
Canadian government, unsurprisingly, has chosen to take a rather soft
stance on the Issue.
Fortunately,
Maher Arar, the Canadian citizen sent off to
Syria
for no good reason and then tortured for no good reason (no, American
government incompetence and arrogance are not “good reasons”), is
taking the matter into his own scarred hands.
Arar
is suing
US
Attorney General John Ashcroft, the czar of the rights-assailing
campaign to apprehend terrorists in the US
.
Ashcroft is loved by few, and hated by many worried about infringements
upon civil rights by Ashcroft’s actions, especially the Orwellian-named
Patriot Act.
The
US State Department has, for years, listed
Syria
as a nation that engages in systematic torture of prisoners. George W
Bush, in a recent speech, referred to
Syria
as having “a legacy of torture and oppression.” Yet, oddly enough,
the
US
recently attempted to defend themselves against the deportation of Arar
by claiming that
Syria
had told them that he’d be treated “humanely.”
Common sense would insist that it's not In America's best Interest to
trust the claims of a nation that they themselves denounce for a
“legacy of torture and oppression.” But when did common sense ever
play a part In the US government's oft-occurring spin on the facts?
According
to the 21 January
broadcast
of 60 Minutes II, “Torture in Syrian prisons is well-documented. The
state department’s own report cites an array of gruesome tortures
routinely used in Syrian jails.” When Arar was told where he was being
deported, he said, “the first thing I did was I started crying,
because everyone knows that
Syria
practices torture.” He continued, “When I arrived there, I saw the
photos of the Syrian president, and that’s why I realized I was indeed
in
Syria
... I wished I had a knife in my hand to kill myself.”
The actions of Ashcroft & Co., specifically, deportation of an
Individual with full knowledge of the torture awaiting them at their
destination, Is Illegal according to the Torture Victim Protection Act
of 1991. Signed Into law by none other than George W. Bush's father.
Of
course, there is fault on the Canadian side, as well. The possibility
that our own officials passively allowed a Canadian, with no proof of
any wrongdoing, to be deported to
Syria
,
Is an ugly one. The matter must be looked into, and as the facts unfold,
it surely will be--but It Is so far clear that Ashcroft's crime-busters
have committed a crime of their own, with or without some Canadian
assistance.
The
actions of the US
government in this affair, as well as the marginally weak Canadian
response, are unacceptable. Arar’s decision to sue John Ashcroft (and
seventeen other American officials, including
Tom
Ridge
and FBI Director Robert Mueller) is certainly an appropriate one.
Ashcroft, who by many accounts is an extremist, is the main man
responsible for apprehending terrorists. Is
America
’s
top job in the “war on terror,” the task of finding and apprehending
extremists, capable of being performed optimally by a man who himself is
often considered an extremist? Ashcroft and the Patriot Act are not
staying true to American ideals in the fight against
terrorists—American rights and liberties—and by association Canadian
ones—are being diluted. Hopefully a dose of that other form of
American justice, the lawsuit, will show the negligent American
authorities that arrogance and negligence don’t pay when dealing with
Canadian citizens. |